What's Playing at My House

The Holiday vs. Sleepless in Seattle

Really, it's not fair of me to do this. The Holiday is a sweet little movie and if you can get over the fact that Cameron Diaz is one of the actors [my dislike of her blonde bubblehead persona knows no bounds], it's worth your time.

But I had the misfortune to watch The Holiday just a couple days before I re-watched Sleepless in Seattle.

And what started out as a fun, light flick quickly faded when I remembered what a great comic romance really looks like.

In The Holiday, Cameron Diaz and Kate Winslet are alone for the holidays and decide to trade homes for Christmas vacation. Removed from normal routines, each discovers a new relationship. I guess my biggest problem here is, that I could much more easily believe Kate Winslet and Jude Law falling for each other, and Cameron Diaz falling for Jack Black. Of course, it's the other way around.

The Holiday is slow at various times. It's not as tightly scripted as the best movies in this genre. And while I noticed it a bit while I was watching it, it wasn't really obvious until I watched Sleepless in Seattle.

We watched SiS in Florida last week, hoping for a movie that everyone from the 7yo to my dad would enjoy. We did it! The 7yo has discovered Bill Cosby, so I hoped she'd enjoy this too. What I didn't remember was Rosie O'Donnell's character in SiS. Oh my word, so funny.

But best of all, the movie is quick, unexpected and well written. Each character shines in a different way, and they fit together perfectly.

While I've enjoyed everything Tom Hanks has ever been in, I just love him in a comedy like this. It seems so effortless, so real, to watch him. The man is a genius. And perfectly paired with Meg Ryan.

So sure, watch The Holiday. Just don't go expecting Sleepless when you do.

Man of the Year

I really wanted to like this Robin Williams comedy. Frankly, I'm their target audience: I watch Jon Stewart religiously; I love political comedies; I'm a Robin Williams fan. But Man of the Year just disappointed me.

In MotY, Robin Williams plays a talk-show comedian who's egged on by his audience into running for president. Originally a token candidate, he runs a decent race, but then unexpectedly wins, despite polling very much to the contrary.

Now, to be fair, it's an amusing movie. Robin Williams [paired with Christopher Walken, hilarious] is funny without being overbearing. But....

* The opening—narrated by Christopher Walken as if he's being interviewed—gives the feel of serious political satire. Nothing else in the movie rises to that level.

* Want a good political satire? Bob Roberts, first off. This fabulous Tim Robbins flick bites hard. Done in documentary style, and highlights a corrupt candidate for Senate and his "down-home fascism" as Roger Ebert calls it.

* How about Wag the Dog? Also a Barry Levinson movie (like Man of the Year) but Wag the Dog is fast-paced, political and hard-edged all the way through.

With Man of the Year, I felt like Levinson couldn't decide whether to do a romance, a comedy or a political satire, so he threw in a tad of each and mixed them all together. Laura Linney's character is especially infuriating: she knows how and why Williams became president, but it takes her repeated encounters with him to a. spill the beans and b. stop acting like a lunatic.

Final thoughts: Got a free evening? Eh, go ahead. But don't make a special effort over this one.

The Age of Innocence

I saw this movie when it came out, and I remember liking it. But I just watched it again last night, and I'm now thinking this is one of the best movies I've ever seen.

Superlatives are so shopworn nowadays that I'm having trouble deciding how to describe The Age of Innocence. How about instead, I'll start with a confession: Normally, I'm a major stickler for reading the book before seeing the movie. To the point where I bought all three Lord of the Rings books and whipped through them when I heard the movies were in production, so I'd be ready to watch them. [Review at a later date....] For some reason, I have never read The Age of Innocence [Edith Wharton, 1920, Pulitzer-winning book]. After seeing the movie again, I'm dying to.

I don't know if my book club friend Jamie reads this blog, but I will apologize to her if she does and this post has already made her faint. We have a long-running dispute: Who's better, Ernest Hemingway or Jane Austen? It turned out that neither of us had read the other's favorite author, being so turned off by the style. And I'm the Hemingway girl. We agreed to read at least one book of the other's choosing, and I waded through Pride and Prejudice last year, only so I could make her read a Hemingway. 

If you've read the two of those, you may also be surprised that I'm so in love with this film. I am curious to see if I like the book. I'll have to report back on that front. But what a masterpiece Martin Scorsese has created here!

A. The actors are incredible. Put Daniel Day-Lewis in a film about the dogcatcher and I'm there. This is a great role for him: he so often plays the angry man, but this character is fabulously multi-dimensional. Lewis is engaged and then married to Winona Ryder, who is exquisite here as the bland face of convention, though possessing a depth we don't appreciate until later. The scenes between Michelle Pfeiffer and Lewis are maddening as they struggle to avoid sweeping away in their emotions. Maddening in a it-makes-you-feel-like-they-must-feel-and-you-can't stand-it-any-more-than-they-can kind of way. The supporting cast is also crucial: they personify the sharp edges hidden under the polite veneer of 1870s New York high society, building a stockade around Lewis' character he is unable -- and unwilling -- to break through.

B. Have you ever felt so sorry for rich people? Is anyone in this film really happy?

C. The costumes and settings are so perfect, so what you imagine the time period was like [at least for the upper crust]. FYI, The Age of Innocence won an Oscar for costume design. Well-deserved. Why it didn't have more, I can't explain to you.

The Grifters

I wasn't expecting The Grifters to be so, so, disturbing? Thought-provoking? Funny? All of the above.

First off, this movie is not a comedy. But you will laugh at several points throughout this flick, about a bunch of crooks scamming random people and also each other. I don't know that you'd call Grifters a drama exactly....it's really more of a character study than anything. And my, what disturbing characters.

Stars John Cusack, Annette Bening and the fabulous Anjelica Huston, along with a lot of other people you'll know. Watch for Jeremy Piven as a sailor on the train. And J.T. Walsh is in there -- this guy was in everything in the 80s and 90s prior to his untimely death in 1998. I especially remember him as Lt. Col. Markinson in A Few Good Men. But I'm off topic.

This movie came out in 1991, giving us the answer to the question: Has John Cusack always been this good? Yes, he has. Not to say I've loved all of his movies....but there aren't many I wouldn't recommend.

Showing the complex relationship between Roy Dillon [Cusack], and his mother Lilly [Huston], and his girlfriend Myra [Bening],  The Grifters takes you right up to the edge and then pushes you over. Would you betray those closest to you? For how much? Is everything, even your deepest relationships, just a scam if there's a profit involved? How easily can you see other human beings as nothing more than the means to an end?

It's a fabulous movie, but it's certainly not a feel-good. More like, you'll swear you're not the same species as these folks when the movie's done, but deep down, you know it's there. At least a little bit.